Now Playing Tracks

FIERCE's Call to Action Against the New York Times Depiction of Trans Women

janetmock:

Thank you, Fierce, for publishing these letters. I, too, am upset that the Times has not issued an apology for this lacking-in-context piece and/or published any of these letters from others who are angered by the piece. 

fiercenyc:

On July 25, 2012, FIERCE organized a Call to Action asking supporters to submit letters to the New York Times demanding Dignity for Transwomen of Color and LGBTQ Youth in their reporting. The Call to Action was organized in response to a July 24th article: “For Money or Just to Strut, LIving Out Loud on a Transgender Stage.

The article, which relied on and fed into harmful, negative stereotypes of young transwomen of color, neglected to highlight or consider the root causes of why LGBTQ youth are disproportionately on the streets and finding it harder to maintain access and ownership over this historical safe space.

Over the weeks following the action, we received dozens of letters that were not only powerful, but also the acts of solidarity were incredibly moving for all of us here at FIERCE!  Seeing your words and feeling the support of so many allies, we saw the depth and strength of our struggle against transphobia, homophobia, gentrification, and criminalization of LGBTQ youth of color, especially transwomen of color.

As far as we know, theTimesdid not publish the letters. In an effort to empower LGBTQ youth and the communities that support LGBTQ youth-led organizing  in NYC and elsewhere, we wanted to share a small collection of these letters with you.

In love and struggle,

FIERCE

What this article taught me:

Trans-women are catty, trashy whores with big-hair… some of whom might be discriminated against…and oh, yeah - gay history. But trans people are whores.

cognitivedissonance:

newsweek:

How did we get to this point?! David Frum:

Step 1: A story begins in the real world. In this case, some Nebraska ranchers objected to the longstanding practice—approved by the Supreme Court in 1986—of the use of aerial photography to enforce clean water laws.

Step 2: Their elected representatives raise the issue.

Step 3: Somebody on Twitter mistakenly converts “aerial” surveillance into “drone surveillance.”

Step 4: The conservative website PJ Media puts the error into a headline: “EPA Using Spy Drones to Fly Over Midwestern Farms.”

Step 5: The mistake jumps to Fox News, first introduced by Bob Beckel, the token liberal on the afternoon program, “the Five.”

Step 6: Fox News’ Megyn Kelly reports the rumor as fact, unsourced.

Step 7: The Daily Show mocks Kelly’s report, but treats the use of drones as a genuine fact nonetheless.

Step 8: Republicans in Congress write furious letters of complaint.

Step 9: The story is by now a national controversy, without there ever having been a word of truth to it.

via David Frum, h/t Mediaite for the screengrab.

It’s like the game “Telephone” – only with fucked-up, real world consequences instead of giggles.

That said, police departments across the country have expressed interest in using drones for surveillance and pursuit. So I think it’s a serious possibility they could be used domestically.

However, why are we getting pissed off about flying robots with guns committing indiscriminate murder JUST NOW? It’s not like we haven’t been using drones for years to murder people in other countries for awhile now…

“the vibrant, almost viral, life cycle of a falsehood”

Love that phrase.

Also, @cognitivedissonance: it’s because the ranchers are assumed to be white, Christians. If they were Muslim, people-of-color, drone surveillance would be their just reward.

futurejournalismproject:

The Wall Street Journal looks the best and worst jobs of 2012 with data collected by CareerCast from the US Bureau of Labor Statistics. The ranking criteria are based on physical demands, work environment, income, stress and hiring outlook.

Journalism doesn’t do well. Software Engineer leads the pack. For future journalists, combine the two and you might be on to something.

Image: Twitter post by Jason Gay, sports columnist for the Wall Street Journal.

I should quit while I’m ahead.

Except there aren’t any jobs out there…

ryking:

Chart of the Day: Republicans Don’t Trust Anyone (Except Fox News)

Public Policy Polling is out with their 3rd annual TV news trust poll. Among Republicans, as the chart on the right shows, the shape of the river is simple: they don’t trust anyone except Fox News, who they adore. These numbers are spreads, with NBC, for example, garnering 17% trust vs. 69% distrust. Fox News, conversely, garners 73% trust vs. 17% distrust.

Well, you say, maybe this just means that trust in the media is really low these days? Nope. Democrats and Independents may not trust Fox, but they do trust everyone else. The percentages vary, with more skepticism toward some outlets than others, but what non-Republicans don’t do is simply dismiss television news en masse as a bunch of lying corporate shills.

(Source: diadoumenos)

Out In Jersey - NJ's biggest gay news source!

Hey guys!

I write for Out In Jersey magazine. It’s a great news source for LGBTQ specific info, news, entertainment, fashion, health and family in New Jersey.

Check it out if you’re looking for something to do in NJ - they have a great events calendar that aggregates queer events in Jersey.

To Tumblr, Love Pixel Union